Skip to main content

Comparison of CSS-in-JS and Traditional CSS

CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) is the cornerstone of web design, allowing developers to control the look and feel of web applications. Traditionally, CSS has been written in external .css files and linked to HTML documents. However, with the rise of modern JavaScript frameworks like React, new approaches to styling have emerged, notably CSS-in-JS. This section will explore the differences between CSS-in-JS and traditional CSS, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

What is Traditional CSS?​

Traditional CSS involves writing style rules in a separate .css file or within a <style> tag in your HTML. These styles are then applied globally to elements that match the specified selectors (e.g., class names, IDs, or tag names).

Example of Traditional CSS​

/* styles.css */
.container {
  background-color: #f0f0f0;
  padding: 20px;
}

.title {
  font-size: 24px;
  color: #333;
}
<!-- index.html -->
<div class="container">
  <h1 class="title">Hello World</h1>
</div>

Key Characteristics of Traditional CSS​

  • Global Scope: Styles are applied globally by default. A class or ID defined in a CSS file can affect any element in the document that uses that class or ID, regardless of where it is used.
  • Separation of Concerns: CSS is usually kept separate from HTML and JavaScript, following the principle of separation of concerns. This makes stylesheets easier to manage and maintain, especially in large projects.
  • Performance: Traditional CSS is parsed and applied by the browser all at once, which can be efficient for static sites but may require optimizations for larger, dynamic applications.

What is CSS-in-JS?​

CSS-in-JS refers to a technique where CSS is written using JavaScript, often within the same file as your component. This approach is popular in React and other modern JavaScript frameworks.

Example of CSS-in-JS​

// App.js (React)
import React from 'react';

const styles = {
  container: {
    backgroundColor: '#f0f0f0',
    padding: '20px',
  },
  title: {
    fontSize: '24px',
    color: '#333',
  },
};

const App = () => {
  return (
    <div style={styles.container}>
      <h1 style={styles.title}>Hello World</h1>
    </div>
  );
};

export default App;

Key Characteristics of CSS-in-JS​

  • Scoped Styles: CSS-in-JS naturally scopes styles to the component, meaning the styles you define are only applied to that specific component. This avoids unintended side effects caused by global styles.
  • Dynamic Styling: Since styles are written in JavaScript, you can easily compute styles dynamically based on props or state, providing greater flexibility.
  • Integration with Components: CSS-in-JS keeps styles close to the component logic, making it easier to see how a component is styled and reducing the cognitive load when working with complex UIs.

Advantages and Disadvantages​

Traditional CSS​

Advantages:

  • Familiarity: Traditional CSS has been around for decades and is familiar to most developers.
  • Global Styles: Easier to apply consistent styles across multiple components or pages.
  • Tooling Support: Rich ecosystem of tools, including preprocessors like SASS and LESS.

Disadvantages:

  • Global Scope Issues: Without careful management, global styles can lead to conflicts and unintended style applications.
  • Difficulty in Dynamic Styling: Applying dynamic styles (e.g., based on component state) can be cumbersome and often requires additional class manipulation.
  • Separation of Concerns: While separation can be an advantage, it can also make it harder to see how a component is styled in isolation.

CSS-in-JS​

Advantages:

  • Scoped and Predictable: Styles are scoped to the component, preventing unwanted side effects from global styles.
  • Dynamic and Contextual: Easy to apply styles dynamically based on props, state, or other variables.
  • Component-Centric: Keeps styles within the component, making it easier to maintain and understand the code.

Disadvantages:

  • Learning Curve: For those accustomed to traditional CSS, CSS-in-JS can have a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Concerns: In some cases, CSS-in-JS can introduce runtime overhead, especially in large applications, although modern implementations have mitigated many of these concerns.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem: While growing, the ecosystem for CSS-in-JS is not as mature as that for traditional CSS, particularly regarding debugging and performance monitoring.

Further Reading​

  • CSS Modules
  • Styled-Components
  • Emotion
  • Separation of Concerns in Web Development
  • Dynamic Styling in React

Summary​

CSS-in-JS and traditional CSS represent two different approaches to styling web applications. Traditional CSS offers familiarity and ease of applying global styles but can suffer from issues with scope and dynamic styling. On the other hand, CSS-in-JS provides scoped, dynamic styles that integrate seamlessly with components, albeit with a potential learning curve and performance considerations. Both approaches have their place, and the choice between them often depends on the specific needs of the project and the team's familiarity with each technique.